When the names Stephen King and Mike Flanagan converge, the cinematic imagination instinctively braces for the spectral and the terrifying. Their collaboration has become a hallmark of sophisticated, character-driven horror. Yet, with The Life of Chuck, they have subverted all expectation, crafting a film that eschews supernatural dread in favor of a profound existential wonder. It is a work concerned not with the terrors of dying, but with the staggering, cosmic beauty of having lived. This is not so much a departure from Flanagan’s thematic obsessions—memory, trauma, the echoes of the past—as it is their most heartfelt and life-affirming culmination.
The film opens on a world quietly coming undone. California is sinking, the internet has collapsed, and a creeping entropy is fraying the very fabric of society. Through this twilight landscape, a single, baffling image begins to proliferate on billboards and television screens: the unassuming face of an accountant named Charles Krantz, accompanied by the simple message, "39 GREAT YEARS! THANKS, CHUCK!". This central mystery—who is Chuck, and why does his seemingly ordinary life appear to coincide with the end of the universe?—is what immediately captivated audiences, driving conversations and making the film a word-of-mouth discovery on streaming platforms like https://goojara.inc/. Its surprise win of the People's Choice Award at the Toronto International Film Festival, a historically reliable Oscar bellwether, signaled that this unconventional film had struck a deep, resonant chord.
A Story Told Backwards
Flanagan, adapting King's novella with deep fidelity, makes the audacious choice to tell his story in reverse. The film is presented in three acts, beginning with the end: Act Three shows us Chuck’s death as the world simultaneously collapses; Act Two jumps back to a moment of pure, unadulterated joy in his prime; and Act One lands in his formative, trauma-laced childhood. This structure is not a narrative gimmick; it is the very engine of the film's philosophical inquiry. By presenting the effect (a universe dying) before we understand the cause (one man dying), Flanagan forces the viewer to first confront loss on a cosmic scale. We mourn a world before we even know whose world it is. A linear biography would simply recount a life; this reverse chronology constructs a revelation. When we finally understand that the apocalyptic landscape of the first act was the internal universe of one "ordinary" man shutting down, the quiet existence of an accountant is retroactively imbued with the weight of a galaxy.
"I Contain Multitudes": The Philosophical Heart of Chuck
The film’s thematic soul is drawn directly from Walt Whitman's "Song of Myself" and its iconic declaration, "I am large, I contain multitudes". In a pivotal scene, a young Chuck asks his teacher, Miss Richards (Kate Siegel), what the line means. She explains that his head contains everything he has ever known and everyone he will ever meet; his memories form a universe inside him. The film then literalizes this poetic concept with breathtaking ambition. The characters we meet in the apocalyptic Act Three—Marty Anderson (Chiwetel Ejiofor), his ex-wife Felicia (Karen Gillan), and countless others—are the inhabitants of Chuck's dying mind, fleeting encounters and lasting relationships given equal weight as his consciousness fades. The collapsing world becomes a stunning visual metaphor for the physiological process of dying: the loss of the internet is synapses ceasing to fire, the flickering stars are memories fading, the great quakes are the systems of the body shutting down. This is where the film's genre-bending brilliance shines, blending sci-fi apocalypse with intimate drama and even moments of musical splendor.
The Flanagan Touch: A Masterclass in Emotional Cinematography
As an author of this review, I, Evelyn, have long admired Mike Flanagan's command of cinematic language, and what is most striking here is how he repurposes his entire horror toolkit to tell a story of profound hope. The themes of trauma, memory, and haunting that define his work are all present, but their valence is inverted. The "haunting" of the cupola in Chuck's childhood home is not a malevolent spirit but a premonition of his own death—a vision that, rather than cursing him, inspires him to live fully. The existential dread that permeates The Haunting of Hill House is transformed here into existential celebration. Flanagan uses the language of fear to articulate the incalculable value of life, revealing the sentimental, deeply humanistic heart that was always beating beneath the surface of his genre work.
This emotional directness is amplified by the brilliant cinematography of Eben Bolter, who crafts a distinct visual identity for each of the film's three acts. This is not mere stylistic flair; the camera itself tells a story about memory and consciousness.
-
Act Three (The End): Shot with modern, widescreen anamorphic lenses and a cool, teal-and-orange color palette, this section feels like a "Hollywood fever dream," perfectly capturing the surreal, cinematic collapse of a dying mind.
-
Act Two (The Peak): Also anamorphic, this act is drenched in the warm, golden light of a perfect afternoon. It visually represents life at its most vibrant and beautiful, a memory polished to perfection.
-
Act One (The Beginning): Bolter switches to spherical lenses and a more classic 1.85 aspect ratio, a conscious homage to seminal King adaptations like Stand by Me and The Shawshank Redemption. This choice visually codes Chuck's childhood as a nostalgic, foundational myth—precisely how we so often remember our own pasts.
The Inhabitants of Chuck's World
A film about containing multitudes is nothing without its cast, and Flanagan has assembled an extraordinary ensemble to populate Chuck's inner universe. The casting itself is a thematic statement, a sprawling collection of talent that feels perfectly suited for a film you might discover and dissect with friends after finding it on a service like Goojara. When we see major characters from the apocalyptic Act Three reappear as fleeting figures in Chuck's chronological life—a teacher in another classroom, a neighbor, a nurse glimpsed in passing—the film's central thesis lands with powerful emotional clarity. Every person, no matter how brief the encounter, becomes a permanent resident in the world inside our head.
Key Performances
-
Tom Hiddleston as the adult Chuck, masterfully balancing a quiet melancholy with a capacity for explosive, unadulterated joy, most notably in a transcendent sidewalk dance sequence.
-
Chiwetel Ejiofor and Karen Gillan as Marty and Felicia, our empathetic anchors who ground the cosmic mystery in a deeply relatable human story of love and regret.
-
Mark Hamill and Mia Sara as Albie and Sarah Krantz, Chuck's grandparents. Hamill's pragmatic, secretly heartbroken accountant and Sara's life-affirming dancer represent the two poles of Chuck's existence.
-
Benjamin Pajak as young Chuck, who delivers a phenomenal performance that lays the foundation of a boy shaped by both profound loss and an unquenchable wonder for life.
-
The vast Flanagan Players, including Kate Siegel, Samantha Sloyan, Rahul Kohli, and Matthew Lillard, who enrich this world in vital supporting roles, proving the film's point that in the story of a life, there are no small parts.
This emotional directness has resonated strongly with viewers, making The Life of Chuck a word-of-mouth hit on platforms such as Goojara, even as some critics debated its sincerity. While some have found its unabashed earnestness to be overly sentimental, its willingness to wear its heart on its sleeve is precisely its greatest strength in our irony-poisoned age. The film dares to be sincere, to argue for the cosmic importance of every single, supposedly ordinary life.
The Verdict
The Life of Chuck is a profound and audacious film that challenges our cynicism and dares us to embrace hope. It is a "deceptively epic character study" that argues that our lives are not measured in length but in depth, not by grand achievements but by the quiet moments of joy, connection, and dance we gather along the way. It is a beautiful, life-affirming masterpiece, and a film that reminds us that every one of us contains a universe worthy of celebration.
